When Parimutuel Race Track Betting Grabbed a Toe Hold

In 1877 parimutuel betting had a feeble trial at Morrison Kentucky Derby Day parimutuel betting was
and Jerome Parks in New York, but the bookmakersconducted on a large scale for the first time in the
soon killed it. They continued to monopolize race trackUnited States.
betting until 1908 when parimutuel betting secured aColonel Winn's experiment was so popular that the
foothold in this country entirely by accident. The newlyMaryland Jockey Club at Pimlico tried the parimutuel
appointed Sheriff Scott Bullitt of Louisville, Kentucky,system the next year side by side with the regular
charged that bookmaking was a violation of the lawbookmakers operating at the track. So successful
and that it would no longer be tolerated in Jeffersonwas it that other racing associations began to adopt
County in which Churchill Downs was located. Mayorthe system.
Grinstead of Louisville, a violent foe of race trackUnder the dominance of bookmakers, many of whom
gambling, upheld the Sheriff by threatening to send citywere either unscrupulous or downright dishonest, racing
police to the track to enforce the edict. It was a blowhad reached such a low estate that its eventual death
to Colonel Matt J. Winn, director of Churchill Downs,seemed to be in sight. Holiest men who looked upon
because it meant no revenue from betting on theracing as a sport and breeders who were sincerely
Kentucky Derby; but Mayor Grinstead and Sheriffinterested in improving the breed hailed the parimutuel
Bullitt had met their match. Colonel Winn examined thesystem as the savior of racing. They became
local statutes and discovered that, although gamblingcrusaders against the bookmakers, using the
was prohibited, parimutuel betting was not. As a result,parimutuel system as their sword of battle.